Question 1
Named executive, clinical, data, privacy, FHIR, and operations owners exist for the submission program.
Evidence to look forRACI, steering committee terms, decision log
Risk if weakUnowned defects and ambiguous go/no-go decisions.
Find your FHIR readiness maturity level
Answer a deeper 24-indicator diagnostic across governance, PDS data, source intake, FHIR mapping, terminology, validation, security, and operations. See maturity levels, visual results, priority blockers, and practical remediation evidence.
Domain 1 of 813% complete
Governance and Accountability
60%Score the readiness evidence you have today
Ownership, decisions, scope control, executive sponsorship, and readiness evidence.
Question 2
The organization has a documented scope for source systems, program areas, tenant boundaries, and data-use limits.
Evidence to look forScope statement, data-flow map, tenant decision record
Risk if weakTeams validate the wrong data or upload data to an unapproved environment.
Question 3
Readiness decisions are retained with evidence, reviewer, date, and approval status.
Evidence to look forReadiness package, sign-off notes, audit log export
Risk if weakLeaders cannot defend why a submission workflow was approved.