Assess readiness
Score organizational maturity before onboarding hospitals, source systems, and PDS workflows.
Ontario healthcare compliance technology
From fragmented healthcare data to validated FHIR submissions
FHIRBridge helps Ontario mental health and addictions teams assess readiness, profile source data, build reusable mappings, validate FHIR R4 bundles, and maintain audit-ready evidence.
Synthetic demo data Tenant-aware design FHIR R4 oriented HealthTrustIQ product ecosystem
Capabilities
Built for readiness, conversion, validation, and evidence
Each function supports a practical hospital onboarding path, from early assessment to submission operations.
Profile source data
Inspect source templates, completeness, code quality, duplicate keys, and field-level gaps.
Build mappings
Create reusable source-to-PDS-to-FHIR mappings with local evidence and review status.
Validate FHIR R4
Generate Bundle resources and run local package and requirement checks before any submission.
Route transport
Queue payloads, test QA HAPI transport, and separate test endpoints from production destinations.
Audit evidence
Retain conversion jobs, validation outcomes, remediation notes, and exportable evidence packages.
Implementation gap
Hospitals need proof across the whole path, not a one-time conversion
FHIRBridge organizes the readiness work that has to happen before an endpoint connection can be trusted.
Source trust
Mandatory fields, local identifiers, dates, duplicates, and tenant source ownership are not yet proven.
FHIR translation
Source values must map to Ontario MHA concepts, FHIR R4 resources, profiles, and Bundle relationships.
Submission assurance
Validation, remediation, evidence, QA transport, and production authorization need separate controls.
Ontario mandate
Prepare teams for consistent MHA PDS reporting
The product is designed around local preparation for Ontario MHA PDS data capture, source-system alignment, terminology governance, FHIR conversion, validation evidence, and controlled submission planning.
Explore Ontario MHA ReadinessSeven-step workflow
A practical path from source extract to submission-ready evidence
Data-to-FHIR transformation
Make every field traceable from source extract to FHIR R4 output
Teams can see what source column was used, what PDS concept it supports, what FHIR path it populates, and what still needs governance.
Source extractCSV, Excel, SQL export, API payload
CLIENT_MRNPDS client identifierPatient.identifierReadyPROGRAM_IDHealth service programHealthcareService.identifierReadySERVICE_REFERRAL_DATEService referral dateServiceRequest.authoredOnReviewENCOUNTER_MODALITYService modalityEncounter.classTerminologyFHIR BundlePatient, Organization, ServiceRequest, Encounter
Validation and remediation
Turn technical findings into accountable remediation work
Validation output is translated into business-readable blockers, owners, due dates, evidence, and revalidation status.
TerminologyOpen
Local modality code requires approved crosswalk
Data stewardCompletenessDue
No postal code reason missing for blank postal code
Program leadFHIRFixed
ServiceRequest reference must resolve inside Bundle
FHIR analystProduct screenshots
Polished previews of the full platform vision
Labels clearly distinguish available, beta, in-development, and planned capabilities.
Executive Readiness DashboardSubmission readiness
Available84%
Source Data Quality ProfilerRows inspected
Beta1,248
Visual Mapping StudioMapping coverage
Available91%
Human-Readable Validation CentreValidation success
Beta97%
Issue Remediation WorkflowOpen remediation items
In Development23
Submission Operations DashboardTransport mode
PlannedQA
Comparison
Different from basic converters and generic validators
Basic converters
Create JSON output, but usually leave data quality, terminology, evidence, and submission readiness outside the workflow.
Generic validation utilities
Check a payload, but often return technical diagnostics without ownership, remediation tracking, or operational context.
FHIRBridge
Combines readiness, source profiling, mapping governance, FHIR R4 transformation, validation evidence, and controlled routing.
User roles
Clear workflows for each implementation stakeholder
Executive sponsor
Views readiness, maturity, risk posture, and go-live evidence.
FHIR analyst
Maintains mappings, validates bundles, and packages remediation evidence.
Data steward
Profiles source data and resolves field, code, and completeness issues.
Integration lead
Configures routes, tests transports, and monitors submission operations.
Security
Designed for tenant isolation and audit-ready controls
- Authenticated workspace boundary with demo mode clearly labelled.
- Tenant-aware data model and role-based readiness for Supabase RLS.
- Submission evidence, validation outcomes, and audit logs preserved for review.
- Production PHI use requires approved hosting, processing terms, and organizational authorization.
Readiness assessment
Start assessmentFind your maturity level before you connect endpoints
Use the readiness module to score governance, source data, mappings, terminology, validation, transport, security, and operations.
Implementation options
Choose the path that matches your readiness
Readiness sprint
Assess maturity, profile a sample extract, and define remediation priorities.
Pilot implementation
Configure mappings, terminology, validation, evidence exports, and QA transport.
Production onboarding
Finalize tenant controls, endpoint approvals, monitoring, support, and go-live evidence.
FAQ
Direct answers for implementation teams
Is this production Ontario Health submission?
No. The platform separates demonstration, QA, and production concepts. Live Ontario Health submission requires approved onboarding, credentials, agreements, and endpoint details.
Can hospitals upload real PHI now?
Only after the organization approves the environment, tenant controls, data-processing terms, and operational safeguards.
What does the readiness score mean?
It summarizes readiness across source data, mappings, terminology, validation, security, and operational evidence so teams can see what needs remediation.
Why show planned features?
The roadmap is labelled honestly so buyers and implementation teams can see the end-to-end interface-engine vision without implying every module is production-live today.
Move from FHIR uncertainty to submission readiness
Open the authenticated workspace to assess readiness, create mappings, validate bundles, and track evidence.